personal website : Roger Payne

welcome  I  background  climbing  I  development  I  guiding  photography  I  skiing  I  work

Two views from European adventure tour operators

 

Permits and ‘X’ visas

“We avoid India because of the bureaucracy associated with expedition permits.  The three month lead time for all the paperwork is impossible for us - as we would still be selling places after that time.  Then there is the sheer inconvenience of complying with the ‘X’ visa regulations.  For us it is much easier to avoid India and go elsewhere.”

 

 

‘Open’ Peaks

“There seems no logic in having some peaks open and the neighboring peaks in the same locality subject to ‘X’ visa requirement.  Obtaining the ‘X’ visa is expensive, time consuming and ultimately seems pointless as regards the open areas.”

 

Satellite telephones and GPS

“These are vital safety devices for mountaineers, have usage across the world and present no securing threat in open areas.  A change in rules is long overdue.”

 

Uttarakhand

“The additional State Government regulations add restrictions, expense and complexity.  The list of allowable peaks with a single route of approach is arbitrary and highly restrictive, and encourages mountaineering without permits.  The environmental rules, where rubbish must be presented to local officers at the end of the trip in order to reclaim a bond deposit, are not working.”

 

Manali-Ladakh

“There was a proposal to extend the ‘Open’ peak area north from Manali to Ladakh where IMF regulations would be scrapped and open access allowed to mountaineers on payment of a simple fee and proof of insurance.  In other words, mountaineers would be treated on the same basis as trekking parties who already have unrestricted access to these areas.  Nothing yet has been announced - is this another case of a worthwhile idea being wasted?”

 

Liaison Officers

“The system is outdated and should be reviewed.  The LO role dates from the era of large-scale siege style expeditions before the growth of commercial tour operators and small-scale alpine-style expeditions.  Approved tour companies could be assigned a regulatory role on expeditions - they already do all the tasks that LOs used to do.  LOs are unnecessary on small expeditions, adding costs and complications for small teams.  One alternative could be to have seasonal local LOs working like rangers who could check on expeditions and ensure base camps were kept clean.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Keynote Address to the 7th Annual Convention of the Adventure Tour Operators Association of India (ATOAI)

16-18 January 2009, Dehradun, Uttarakhand

The 2009 ATOAI Convention was an excellent opportunity to hear views on the future of adventure tourism in India, and exchange experience and perceptions of the opportunities and challenges ahead.  The following notes are an outline of the Keynote Address, which was accompanied with relevant slides (see slideshow opposite). 

As a guest invited to give an outsider’s perspective, it was easy to recall wonderful personal experiences exploring the Indian Himalayas over the past 25 years, and also highlight some of the relevant examples of adventure tourism in protected areas in other parts of the world.  What was clear at the Convention, is that adventure tourism is already a major part of India’s tourism industry, and ATOAI has been a leader of setting and promoting good practice.  What was also clear is the considerable potential for adventure tourism to promote sustainable development; and that senior figures in the National and the Uttarakhand State Governments want to exploit that potential. 

What was less easy to share, is the experience of those foreign operators who find the process and cost of obtaining permits in India a major obstacle.  Prior to the Convention, views had been sought from European adventure operators with experience of India.  From India’s perspective, the most worrying view was from a major European company with a turnover in excess of IND 200 million, sending 600+ clients to around 40 overseas destinations, and which avoids India because of the bureaucracy associated with expedition permits and ‘X’ visas (see ‘Two Views’ panel).  On a more positive note, another European company provided specific comments and suggestions for improvements on issues such as Open Peaks and restrictions on the use of GPS and satellite telephones (see ‘Two Views’ panel).  Seeking and evaluating constructive comments like these is a vital part of the process of improving arrangements for adventure tourism in India. 

Given the title of the Convention, ‘The New Face of Adventure Travel’, the starting point for the Keynote was to ask why a new face is needed, which was further broken down to:

  ●  What is the potential for adventure tourism in India? 

  ●  What is best practice around the world?  And,  

  ●  Can India improve in terms of benefiting from the potential and

      using best practice? 

It seemed that the distinguished guests, participants, hosts, and organizers of the Convention had agreed with the Honorable Chief Minister Uttarakhand, who said in his opening remarks that the potential was very considerable, and that the Convention should have meaningful interaction to move forward.  Hence, it seemed as if I was following the right lines with my initial questions, and that it was expected that progress would be made.

Having highlighted the global economic value of international tourism (to which should be added domestic tourism), and established an indication of the percentage of the adventure tourism sector, it seemed more than self evident that India has considerable scope to increase its share of what is a very valuable international market; and in addition, that an increase in market share could make a significant contribution towards sustainable development in rural and mountain communities (which would be in line with requests for action made in United Nations Resolutions calling for support for sustainable development). 

Fortunately, there is a lot of experience that India can draw upon to minimize the potential threats and maximize the benefits of adventure tourism.  Examples mentioned included the management of National Parks in North American and the United Kingdom (which cope with annual visitor numbers measured in 10’s of millions and enforce laws to protect nature), and the economic development in the European Alps (which was almost zero at the end of the 2nd World War, but now accounts for around half the global value of international tourism in mountain areas).  Naturally, there may be different views on the most desirable or optimum way to take advantage of the opportunities and benefits, especially with respect to protection of the natural environment and retaining the traditional characteristics of building in and around natural landscapes.  But again, there was a shared view at the Convention regarding the importance of preserving the environment and the traditional character of the associated built environment.

Hence, two key points for all concerned, are that visits to protected areas are an effective way to gain support and resources for protecting those areas, and that such visits must follow the principles of sustainable development and responsible tourism (e.g. as set out in ‘Guidelines for Planning and Managing Mountain Protected Areas’ IUCN 2004, and ‘Sustainable Tourism in Protected Areas’ IUCN 2002).  It should also be remembered that the inspiration for creating the world’s first national parks and other protected areas came from recreationists such as climbers and mountaineers, who recognized the need to protect and preserve those areas for future generations to appreciate and enjoy.  Hence, visitors to protected areas should be seen as an important part of the solution for the protection and enjoyment of nature, which highlights the very important contribution that responsible adventure tourism can make to protect the environment and sustainable development.

Recalling India’s space programme, including the success of the recent lunar probe and the 10-year plan for a manned flight to the Moon, a parallel with adventure tourism was drawn with regard to having a widely agreed long-term aim, developing a ‘road map’ to achieve the aim and supporting objectives, and a step by step action plan.

(up to next coloum)

 

 

download the Keynote Address as a .pdf

download the slide presentation as a .pdf

 

continued from bottom of previous column:

A further parallel was made by recalling the cooperation and commitment shown by a small group of climbers from India, Pakistan and the UK; who, as part of the UN International Year of Mountains in 2002, had climbed peaks in Switzerland to draw attention to the need to protect mountain environments and the value of transboundary protected areas (also known as peace parks - see ‘Transboundary Protected Areas for Peace and Co-operation’ IUCN 2001) as a means to resolve disputed borders.  This initiative was apparently the first time climbers from India and Pakistan had formed to team to climb a mountain together, which was an excellent demonstration of cooperation and friendship.  Also, Jamie Andrew from Scotland, as a quadruple amputee, brought an additional dimension to the team’s cooperation and determination; and provided a practical example that anything is possible by breaking big challenges into small steps.

 

Recalling experience of the administrative procedures to obtain peak permits for trips in India, it was noted that the internet is now the biggest way people locate and book services.  Attention was draw to the simplicity of the Google search page, which is the most popular webpage in the world, and has a 75% market share in Europe and North America.  It is forecast that Google will soon become the world’s biggest advertiser (by revenue).  The laws in India concerning access to mountains and national parks were passed in the 1970’s, since when many changes have taken place in India including the emergence of a body of experienced adventure tour operators, new capacities and expectations in the State Governments, and a better understanding of the potential of tourism and recreation to support sustainable development in rural and mountain communities. 

 

Noting the present situation, the turmoil in international banking and the recent tragic terrorist attacks in Mumbai have already had a negative impact on business and luxury tourism travel to India.  However, the adventure tourism sector may well be less affected by these events; and given the unrealized potential in India, could even grow if unnecessary bureaucratic obstacles can be removed and more best practice adopted.  Hence, the Convention is timely and subsequent actions could bring about significant improvements.     

 

As a reminder of the wonderful opportunities for mountaineering in India, the Keynote Address ended with a short video of images and music of an alpine-style climbing trip to Sikkim.  In addition to giving sincere thanks to all those who had helped realize the trips I have made in the Indian Himalayas, the closing remarks of the Keynote Address were to thank the distinguished guests, hosts, organizers and participants for their attention and the opportunity to make a small contribution to the Convention; and to wish all concerned well for the discussions that would follow.  As a contribution to potential recommendations that might be agreed by the Convention, it was mentioned that colleagues in Britain and Switzerland had indicated a willingness to respond if requests are made to help with guide training and mountain rescue.  These are areas where there is already experience in India, and potential to reach recognized international standards.

 

In terms of the key issues raised, the final proposition was to encourage the Convention participants to consider the following as part of their deliberations: 

  ●  To make better use of the potential for adventure

      tourism to support sustainable development. 

  ●  To learn from experience and best practice. 

  ●  To remove unnecessary obstacles to adventure tourism

      in India. 

 

Comments on some of the discussions during the Convention:

The presentations and discussions that formed the main substance of the Convention were wide ranging and included many expert contributions.  Two areas that I would like to comment on are:

 

Carrying capacity, litter and waste management

There are different ways to assess and manage carrying capacity.  A total ban on visitors is not a means to promote sustainable development and the protection of nature.  Litter and waste management can be a problem in popular areas, and there are many examples of how these problems have been solved.  Visitor education is a vital part of this, backed up where necessary with properly enforced penalties.

 

Glacier retreat in the Himalayas

The receding Gangotri Glacier was mentioned, and it was suggested that this was connected to the number of people who trek to the snout of the glacier.  However, it is widely accepted that the worldwide retreat in glaciers is a result of climate change and global warming.  Indeed, the day following the Convention, the international media (e.g. see www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jan/19/glacier-rising-sea-levels) was reporting the latest concerns expressed by the World Glacier Monitoring Service, which advises the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.  Recent forecasts by the IPCC suggest that if current climate trends continue, up to 80% of Himalayan glaciers will have disappeared in 30-40 years.  Hence, adventure tourism has an important opportunity to help educate visitors so that they understand how to reduce the human contribution to global warming, and also to be prepared for the consequences of climate change.  Therefore, a key principle for all responsible managers of protected areas around the world, is to see visitors not as part of the problem, but as a vital part of the solution.

 

 

welcome  I  background  climbing  I  development  I  guiding  photography  I  skiing  I  work

 

© Roger Payne 2005-09

Contact (please add '@' to): roger   rogerpayne.info

 

 

Advice on Best Practice 

In 2007 UNEP published 'Tourism and Mountains: A practical guide to managing the social and environmental impacts of Mountain Tours' along with a self-assessment check list.

 

Another example of a systematic tool to manage environmental impact is the European Union's Eco Management Audit System (EMAS) - see http://ec.europa.eu/environment/emas/index_en.htm).  Such a system could be developed for other regions and used to protect the environment while allowing responsible recreation and tourism that supports sustainable development for rural communities.

 

Conservation and Sustainable Development in Mountain Areas (IUCN, 2004) - a good overview presented to the World Conservation Forum at the 3rd World Conservation Congress, Bangkok, Thailand, 17-25 November 2004. 

To download of order copies of IUCN publications go to: www.iucn.org/resources/publications/publications_search/

Guidelines for planning and managing mountain protected areas (IUCN, 2004) - would apply to all protected areas, such national parks, with mountains.

To download of order copies of IUCN publications go to: www.iucn.org/resources/publications/publications_search/

Sustainable tourism in protected areas : guidelines for planning and management (IUCN, 2002) - would apply to all protected areas such as national parks and World Heritage Sites.

To download of order copies of IUCN publications go to: www.iucn.org/resources/publications/publications_search/

Transboundary protected areas for peace and co-operation (IUCN, 2001) - would apply to areas where there are disputed borders (also see http://www.rogerpayne.info/swiss%20summit.htm).

To download of order copies of IUCN publications go to: www.iucn.org/resources/publications/publications_search/